SILLAGE
This is only a portion of what you would receive.
The full commission runs to twenty parts and roughly ninety pages. The page you are reading presents the complete structure — all twenty parts are here — but each is tightened for the screen. What this web edition leaves out:
- The long development of each analysis, reduced here to its conclusion
- The complete competitor files, one per player, dissected sentence by sentence
- The entire deployment kit: ready-to-use copy, fifteen content angles, the first-week plan
- The four detailed audience profiles, with triggers, resistances and exact wording
- The complete visual identity brief, with directional references and executions to refuse
- The full signature essay, publishable as-is, and the origin manifesto
- The six playbooks in long form: full scripts, objection trees, incident protocols and interview grids
- The house
- SILLAGE — Lyon, four years old. Construction site tracking software.
- The founder
- Claire Vasseur, architect, ten years in project supervision.
- The state
- 340 paying accounts. €47,000 monthly recurring revenue. Six people. No funding.
- The fracture
- Built for independent architects. 61% of revenue now comes from general contractors. The language still speaks to the former.
- What she came to say
- “We're losing architects and we can't move upmarket with contractors. We're stuck in the middle.”
An extract from the document. Drag the handle.
In a context where traceability is becoming a major issue for construction stakeholders, it appears essential to be able to demonstrate the compliance of executed works.
You know you're right. You can't show it. You pay.
Differentiation Diagnostic
The field as it stands
| House | Their sentence | What it really promises |
|---|---|---|
| BATIFLOW | “The construction management platform.” | That the problem is dispersion. Buys exhaustiveness at the cost of memorability. |
| CHANTIER.IO | “Digitise your sites.” | That you are behind. Wins the user, loses whoever signs. |
| BAUSYNC | “Collaboration on site.” | That the friction is relational. A word nobody contests is a word nobody remembers. |
| CARNET+ | “The site logbook, new generation.” | That the logbook is still the right unit of thought. Anchors itself in the object it claims to surpass. |
| PREUVEO | “Zero disputes, zero rework.” | That fear of litigation drives the purchase. A defensive register the trade rejects. |
Strip the names and all five sentences say the same thing in five disguises: the site is poorly held while it runs, and we will hold it better. All of them sit during. The entire field is locked onto three ideas — efficiency, modernisation, coordination — and fights over the same second of time.
None speaks of the after. None speaks of the moment the site is delivered, the crew is elsewhere, and a client contests something eight months later that nobody remembers precisely. Yet that is the only moment site tracking stops being a convenience and becomes a question of money.
The current sentence — autopsy
“Simple, visual construction site tracking.” Six words, three structural faults.
- “Construction site tracking” — that is the name of the category, not of what SILLAGE does. All five competitors could write it without lying. A positioning sentence must be unavailable to the others.
- “Simple” — three competitors already claim it. It is a product attribute, not a position in perception. And it signals light, therefore less complete, therefore cheaper.
- “Visual” — describes the means instead of the result. It turns SILLAGE into a photo app, when everyone already owns one. The sentence manufactures its own principal objection: “we already have a photo group chat.”
All of SILLAGE's real value is absent from the sentence that describes SILLAGE. The consequence is a price ceiling: a sentence fixes a reference class, and price is never negotiated — it is deduced from the category you are compared to. Filed under productivity, SILLAGE is worth two hours a week, which is precisely the €40 ceiling it keeps hitting.
The chosen ground
Four territorial vacuums were identified: proof, zero effort, asymmetry, transmission. SILLAGE takes the first.
- It is already true — timestamping, client validation and ordered archiving all exist. The repositioning demands a rewrite of the language, not of the product.
- It shifts the reference class: proof belongs to risk protection, not to productivity tools. The ceiling disappears.
- It targets the right buyer: general contractors carry the direct cost of a dispute. Already 61% of revenue.
- It raises the decision-maker: a tool is bought by the user, a protection by the directors.
- It destroys the principal objection: against a house that constitutes proof, “we already have a photo group” collapses in one sentence.
What the territory costs, stated plainly: the architects. The proof narrative addresses whoever executes and carries the cost. That segment's 16% of revenue will decline. This is not a side effect — it is the entry price.
The verdict
SILLAGE does not stand in the middle of the field: it stands inside someone else's category, using words that already belong to five houses, describing the means it employs instead of the moment it serves. Its price ceiling is not a perceived-value problem — it is the arithmetic consequence of a sentence that files the house under productivity when it belongs under protection.
Published as an illustration. SILLAGE, its founder and the houses named here correspond to no existing company.
This is what you receive.
The same work, applied to yours, begins with an extraction no machine can automate: your truth, your singularity, the thing you no longer see because you are inside it.
Limited to four commissions per quarter.